50% of the most popular people believe that the im

50% of the people believe that the imperfect system makes it difficult to ban excessive packaging

April 22, 2013 is the 44th world earth day. According to the Ministry of land and resources, the theme of this year's activities in China is to cherish the earth's resources, change the mode of development, jointly build ecological civilization, and build a beautiful China

Earth Day is an important day to publicize the national conditions and policies of China's land and resources, improve the public's awareness of saving and intensive use of resources, and popularize the knowledge of Earth Science and technology. The viewpoint Department of legal system jointly conducted an investigation with Sohu. On the occasion of world earth day, it focused on the excessive packaging of a large amount of urban garbage

how to choose the experimental machine produced by Jinan Shijin in many experimental machine manufacturers? Recently, the China Environmental Development Report (2013), published by the social science literature press, said that government departments, environmental protection experts, the general public, and even the packaging industry itself believed that commodity packaging was generally excessive. Due to the large amount of use of commodity packaging, most of which are disposable consumer goods, and the short life cycle, it consumes a lot of resources and leads to a large amount of waste emissions

according to statistics, at present, the volume of packaging waste in China accounts for half of solid waste, and the annual waste value is as high as 400billion yuan. China's annual packaging output reaches more than 30 million tons, but the overall recovery rate is less than 30%. If we reduce excessive packaging, we can greatly reduce environmental pollution

□ accurate report

Guo Fen, a Beijing citizen who once held an important position in an industry association, is still active in the business community after retirement, and all kinds of gifts have not been cut off. What bothers her is that more than half of the idle items at home today are all kinds of exquisite outer packaging boxes

look at me. Guo Fen walked around his home with aluminum bag packaging, blue and white porcelain craft porcelain cans, and leather handbags. In a 120 square meter home, you can even see that the substrate of the outer packing box is some imitation gold foil, red silk, yellow satin, and the hard outer box is also painted with gold paint

it's a pity to throw away these gift boxes. Sell them as waste products, and you feel lost again. Guo Fen told that the waste collectors in the community do not recycle the packaging of many goods because they are not paper products. The gift box packaging is not worth as much as the waste newspaper. What can be sold is sold as waste. What cannot be sold can only be thrown away, and it is useless to keep it. But looking at those expensive packages is really distressing

what makes people distressed is not only the apparent waste of money, but also the pollution of the environment. Among the more than 1600 people who participated in the survey, six adults attributed the biggest problem caused by excessive packaging of goods to waste of resources and garbage. In addition, 94.07% of the people who participated in the survey believed that excessive packaging of goods was bound to cause environmental pollution

45% of the respondents

it is difficult to buy simple packaged goods

for the outer packaging of goods, Guo Fen said that her feelings belong to changing from love to hate

at first, I thought these outer packages were quite interesting. A bottle of red wine can be matched with a wine glass, a wine opener, and some even with a thermometer and white gloves. But gradually, the packaging began to waste. Take some fruit gift boxes for example. If you want to eat the fruit inside, you must first take out the gift box from the paper bag, then open the box cover, lift the silk mat, and tear open the plastic. Guo Fen said that every Spring Festival, his downstairs will be filled with all kinds of packaging

at the beginning, people still treated garbage by classification, but because the packaging volume is becoming larger and larger, and the types are becoming more and more complex, first, the packaging box exceeds the volume of the garbage can, and second, we can't catch up with the residents to throw it away, resulting in the accumulation of packaging boxes. Guofen residential property management company staff complained to this

the packaging of goods belongs to solid waste. In addition to direct utilization, recycling and conversion, a large part will be directly landfilled as domestic waste. An insider from the pollution control department of the Environmental Protection Bureau revealed to the public that in recent years, the solid waste formed by excessive packaging of goods is gradually increasing, and the pollution it brings is not obvious at present, but it can't be underestimated over time

take China's traditional festival gift moon cakes as an example. According to incomplete statistics, China produces more than 100 million boxes of moon cakes every year, consuming a lot of wood materials. In other words, on a mid autumn festival, people across the country will eat a large area of forest

experts such as Xu Haiyun of China Academy of urban construction once calculated that at present, China produces about 1.2 billion shirts a year, of which 800million are boxed, and 0.8 billion packaging boxes need 240000 tons of paper. If we take the big trees with a diameter of 10 cm as the standard, every seven trees can produce one ton of paper, and 800 million packaging boxes are equivalent to cutting 1.68 million big trees. In other words, just shirts, consumers wear a large area of forest in a year. The cartons used to pack shirts are only a drop in the bucket in all commodity packaging. At present, China's annual packaging output reaches more than 30 million tons, and the overall recovery rate is less than 30% of the output

luxury packaging usually pursues bright colors in design and composite materials in material. In this regard, Dong Jinshi, Secretary General of the International Food Packaging Association, said that the color ink and compounds produced by gorgeous packaging are not conducive to recycling, and are truly beautiful garbage. On the contrary, the simpler and more transparent the packaging, the better the decomposition, and the more valuable it is for consumers to sell waste products

and the public seems to have long known the harm of excessive packaging

1/3 of urban domestic waste is packaging waste, more than half of which belongs to over packaging. In Beijing, there are about 830000 tons of packaging waste every year, of which 600000 tons are excessive packaging. 67.2% of the respondents said they were not surprised, so they resisted excessive packaging. Only 16.32% said it was the first time to hear it. It was too surprised to think that excessive packaging would pollute the environment

then, if the excessive packaging of goods is so unpopular, why does it take the lead in the packaging industry

in this regard, 45% of the respondents believed that it was precisely because the over packaged goods were mainly used for gift giving, while the essence 4 The inflexible up and down movement of the large diameter extension meter makes the packaging and gift giving appear expensive, which leads to a large audience of over packaged goods. In addition, less than 9% of people believe that there is a market for over packaging because some consumers pursue luxury

what is not adopted here is the configuration of a pair of multi cavity molds. It is worth noting that 45% of the respondents believe that at present, people buy over packaged goods because it is difficult to see goods with simple packaging, so they have to buy over packaged goods

more than 50% of people believe that the regulatory industry standards need to be improved

the General Administration of quality supervision, inspection and quarantine and the National Standards Commission issued the national standard "food and cosmetics requirements for limiting excessive packaging of goods" in 2010, which clearly requires that the packaging design should be based on the principle of effectively utilizing resources and reducing the amount of packaging materials on the premise of meeting normal needs

according to Mao Da, a postdoctoral fellow at the school of chemistry, Beijing Normal University, the new version of the cleaner production promotion law was officially implemented on July 1, 2012. Article 20 of the revised Cleaner Production Promotion Law stipulates to curb excessive packaging: the design of products and packages should consider their impact on human health and the environment in the life cycle, and give priority to non-toxic, harmless, easy to degrade or easy to recycle schemes. The packaging of products by enterprises should be reasonable, and the material, structure and cost of packaging should be compatible with the quality, specification and cost of the internal products, so as to reduce the generation of packaging waste, and excessive packaging is not allowed. However, in this survey, more than 50% of the people pointed the finger at the relevant departments for the reasons why excessive packaging has been banned repeatedly. 28.79% of the people believed that the national division of production, sales and other links in the supervision of excessive packaging was not clear enough, and another 23.38% of the people believed that the policies and standards of the relevant departments were imperfect. At present, only the relevant standards in the field of food and cosmetics have been improved, not involving drugs, health care products and other fields, Even some industries have no standards

Xu Ying, a lawyer in Beijing, also said that in addition to food and cosmetics, commodity packaging in most areas is still in a state of no standards and no supervision. She hoped that relevant departments would enact legislation as soon as possible to ensure the realization of circular economy

in this regard, Dong Jinshi believes that it is mainly due to practical factors, which has led to the delay in the introduction of regulations restricting the over packaging of goods in China. Polyamide composites have the characteristics of high elasticity, self lubrication, wear resistance, impact resistance, corrosion resistance and so on

in Dong Jinshi's view, the practical difficulties mainly come from the difficulty in unifying standards

for example, some goods are special, such as calligraphy and painting, and a thin layer of paper. If they are determined according to unified standards, it is difficult to ensure the safety in the transportation process; Another example is the slender fibrous root of ginseng, which must be packaged in large packages for its integrity. How to formulate standards? Dong Jinshi said

in this survey, 13.21% of the respondents preferred that the relevant departments should formulate the compulsory recycling catalogue of commodity packaging under the relevant legal framework as soon as possible, and truly implement the producer extension system

in this regard, Mao Da said that if the State Council formulates the catalogue of compulsory recycling of commodity packaging under the framework of the circular economy promotion law, although the inclusion of any kind of packaging in the catalogue may cause great social controversy, a truly meaningful system must start

secondly, although the "requirements for food and cosmetics to restrict excessive packaging of goods" has been issued, because the document is only a national standard, the industry and commerce or quality supervision departments lack legal basis to punish excessive packaging that violates the standard. From this point of view, the legislative process of regulations restricting excessive packaging of goods should be accelerated. Maoda said

at the same time, for the more inclined method to restrict the excessive packaging of goods, 30.98% said that the proportion of packaging cost in the selling price should be strictly stipulated, and 22.95% and 5.48% respectively believed that the luxury packaged goods could be subject to heavy taxes or packaging recycling and reuse